Both the establishment of the new U.S. Space Force and that agency’s SATCOM vision are based on a universal understanding that the space domain is no longer an uncontested, benign environment for our military. Our adversaries today are increasingly capable of blocking, jamming or attacking satellites – making it possible for them to deny the technological and strategic advantage that space resources have delivered to the warfighter in the past.

The new NDAA, the new Space Force, and the new SATCOM vision are a reaction and answer to this new reality and new challenge in space.

Aside from the establishment of the Space Force, how does the new NDAA impact the way the military acquires satellite resources? What exactly is in that new SATCOM vision that will defend military satellite capabilities? How does the establishment of the Space Force change the way military interacts and engages with the commercial space and satellite industries?

Jon Bennett, the Vice President for Government Affairs, Marketing and Corporate Communications at SES Space and Defense, recently joined the Government Technology Insider Podcast to educate listeners about this and other topics. During his discussion with GTI Podcast host, Peter Jacobs, Jon talked about the provisions in the new NDAA, the revolutionary approach laid out in the Space Force SATCOM vision and the ways that the military is transforming how it approaches space and the acquisition of space resources.

Click the PLAY button below to listen to their conversation.

For additional information on the role that next generation commercial satellites can play in delivering essential government applications and communications, click HERE.

The post PODCAST – how the 2020 NDAA and Space Force revolutionize the military’s approach to space appeared first on SES Space and Defense.

Another historical “first “ happened shortly after, when Vice President Mike Pence swore in Gen. John “Jay” Raymond, the former Commander of the Air Force Space Command, as the Space Force’s first-ever Chief of Space Operations. According to Military.com, he will be joined by the, “Roughly 16,000 active-duty and civilian personnel that make up Air Force Space Command.”

And, while many late-night television pundits have mocked the creation of the Space Force – the need for a Space Force is no laughing matter. In fact, it’s something that has been a common topic of conversation in the space and satellite industry for more than a decade.

Making the case for a Space Force
Since 2007, when China demonstrated its ability to successfully destroy a satellite in orbit with a kinetic attack, there has been one universal theme that we have heard reflected in the comments from industry and military speakers at every satellite and space conference and exposition – space is no longer a benign environment.

This sentiment was reflected in comments by Gen. Raymond, himself, who once said, “There’s great alignment in our nation today that space is a warfighting domain, just like air, land and sea… [we’re] at a strategic inflection point and that’s a point where we used to operate in a benign domain, but today we’re operating in a contested domain.”

The concept of space being a contested environment is not a welcome one for the military, which has long held a technological edge over its adversaries largely in thanks to U.S. assets in space. As Col. Steve Butow, the Space Portfolio Director at the Defense Innovation Unit, once said, “…we use technology as our offset. If we lose our technological offset, we have to fight a fair fight, and that’s not what we want to do. We want to have technological capabilities that keep us in a dominant position in all domains.” And many of those technological offsets are only available to the warfighter thanks to satellites.

Military intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance (ISR) operations rely on space resources. Military communications travel over satellites to get to American warfighters deployed in places with no terrestrial networks, or where terrestrial networks are untrusted or denied. Satellites are even essential for military position, navigation and timing (PNT).

Understanding the role satellite plays in successful military operations and that our satellites are vulnerable to attack and interference from adversaries makes the necessity for the Space Force clear. This new branch of the military will train a new generation of space professionals and acquire the space capabilities and technologies needed to compete in a new warfighting domain and maintain our technological offset.

This is clearly reflected in the Space Force’s mission statement:

The USSF is a military service that organizes, trains, and equips space forces in order to protect U.S. and allied interests in space and to provide space capabilities to the joint force. USSF responsibilities include developing military space professionals, acquiring military space systems, maturing the military doctrine for space power, and organizing space forces to present to our Combatant Commands.

And there’s one part of that mission statement that has the space and satellite industry the most excited – the part about the Space Force being responsible for “acquiring military space systems.”

A single authority for space acquisition?
The Space Force just launched and it’s expected to be officially stood up over the course of the next 18 months. It’s still early, and it’s hard for any industry pundits on the outside looking in to say exactly how its creation will impact the way in which the military interacts with the satellite industry.

However, there is some optimism across the satellite industry that having a dedicated military branch with the responsibility of acquiring space systems and resources could help to ensure a better working relationship between the military and private industry.

Traditionally, the military has relied on purpose-build, custom satellite solutions that it finances, launches and manages itself to meet its needs for space capabilities. However, as we’ve discussed in numerous articles on this very publication, the overarching belief is that commercial satellites are the more innovative, less expensive and more resilient alternative for the military. As the CEO of commercial satellite provider, SES Space and Defense, Pete Hoene recently said, “Over the past ten years, what we’ve found is that commercial has taken over in terms of investment and innovation.”

However, despite the benefits, the military continues to invest in new communications satellites for its own constellation and continues to purchase commercial satellite capacity on the spot market – which often results in higher prices and less availability. The satellite industry has long called for the military to start thinking of commercial capability as part of an integrated satellite architecture that includes military satellites, but that has yet to truly come to pass.

The creation of the Space Force – a single entity tasked with ensuring our military’s continued dominance and technological advantage in the warfighting domain of space – could be the spark that finally ignites that change in attitudes and culture. And the individual at the top of that new military branch has illustrated a desire to work more closely with industry in the future.

“I think what we’ll see in the future is a more hybrid architecture which would provide us with more resiliency,“ Gen. Raymond told us during last year’s Air Force Association Air, Space and Cyber Conference. “We’re here to work with industry and I think that the relationships that we have and that were provided to us by the National Defense Authorization Act will provide us great advantage.”

Time will only tell what impact the Space Force will have on America’s tactical and technological advantage in space, and on the military’s relationship with the satellite industry. But it is further validation that space is an austere environment that will pose new challenges – and exciting new opportunities – for our military moving forward.

Feature image courtesy of U.S. Air Force Senior Airman Melody Howley.

The post Official Space Force launch reflects space’s status as warfighting domain appeared first on SES Space and Defense.

These sentiments were reflected by Retired Major General Jay Santee in the panel discussion immediately following General Raymond’s address. During his introductory remarks, General Santee shared his vision of a combined infrastructure that utilized military satellites working seamlessly together with available COMSATCOM capabilities to deliver the communications and connectivity needed to accomplish missions.

This raised some interesting questions about how the relationship between these parties can be improved, how the COMSATCOM sector could work to address military concerns and the Air Force’s plans for embracing some exciting new COMSATCOM innovations that are rapidly entering the marketplace.

To get answers to these questions, we reached out to Captain AnnMarie Annicelli of the United States Air Force’s public affairs department. Here is what she and the United States Air Force had to say:

GovSat Report: During Lt. Gen. John “Jay” Raymond’s keynote presentation at this year’s SATCON event, he stated that commercial SATCOM was essential for military operations and communications today. What is COMSATCOM’s current role when it comes to empowering military communications operations in theater, and how will that change or evolve in the future?

Captain Annicelli: COMSATCOM enables our armed forces to project power globally, supports the operation of Naval forces underway, Army, Navy, and Air Force mobile units, and allows field commanders to command and control our military forces around the world.

In addition to supporting our military forces COMSATCOM helps us establish a disaggregated satellite communications architecture which provides a more resilient communications system.

We see our relationship with commercial satellite service providers continuing to evolve to provide greater resiliency, transmission protection, increase flexibility, and affordability, all of which our pathfinders efforts are designed to help achieve.

GovSat Report: What stands in the way of increased COMSATCOM use within the federal government and military? What changes are necessary in the acquisition and purchasing processes to open the door for increased COMSATCOM use in the military?

Captain Annicelli: The preservation of our space capabilities, which includes both mission assurance and assured access are very high priorities for the Department.  Space has become a contested environment and our dependence on space-based assets requires that our future space architectures possess sufficient protection measures to ensure mission accomplishment.

Commercial systems provide a cost effective solution to deliver satellite communications because they are designed for efficiency and reduced costs.  While COMSATCOM offers some protection measures, it may offer insufficient protection and flexibility that our future SATCOM systems require to meet the needs of our combatant commanders.

As of FY13, the latest year for which accurate numbers are available, the DoD had leased approximately more than $1 Billion worth of COMSATCOM.  This breaks into ~$780 Million per year for wideband COMSATCOM and almost $240 Million for narrowband mobile-user COMSATCOM.  Focusing on the larger component, commercial lease costs are roughly four times the cost of DoD-owned wideband MILSATCOM based on year-by-year lease costs and is a barrier to the expanded use of COMSATCOM at current cost levels.

DoD has considered use of longer-term leases, however Congressional funding is on a year-by-year basis.  Consideration of longer term leases to reduce costs must include the risk of future year reductions with early lease termination fees that effectively increase the prices for longer term leases.  Based on such considerations, the AF has embarked on a series of purchases (acquisition Pathfinders) of COMSATCOM resources to demonstrate COMSATCOM costs can be substantially reduced with an acquisition (purchase) versus short-term lease approach to COMSATCOM.

In Pathfinder 1, cost reductions on the order of a factor of four versus 1-year leasing was demonstrated where innovative contracting purchased two transponders on a commercial satellite. However, the satellite was an older, end-of-life satellite operating in an inclined orbit, not typical of commercial satellites. As a result, the 4-to-1 reduction in commercial costs achieved in Pathfinder 1 is not anticipated to be repeated for traditional COMSATCOM services.

Planned Pathfinders 2-5 will build on the lessons learned from Pathfinder 1 to demonstrate additional scenarios for increased savings of acquiring COMSATCOM for military use.  High Throughput Satellites (HTS) offer prospects for order of magnitude savings, potentially even less than a follow on to Wideband Global SATCOM (WGS). COMSATCOM technologies hold promise to reset this relationship.

GovSat Report:  In the aforementioned keynote address, General Raymond stated that the military isn’t currently equipped to utilize the next generation of high throughput satellites. What does the military need to do to take advantage of these cost-saving, higher-bandwidth satellites? What can industry do to help the military prepare to utilize this technology?

Captain Annicelli: The use of High Throughput SATCOM (HTS) is already being considered by the Air Force’s Pathfinder initiative; however, HTS requires a more complex approach to ground infrastructure and more flexible approach to terminal architectures than used for traditional systems.  The ability of terminals to offer flexible technology on ramps for HTS products is not an available capability.

HTS system exploit closed network, tightly coupled terminal, modem, satellite systems which are largely indigestible to legacy DoD terminals.  High terminal cost barriers, and inflexible architectures also render terminals resistant to change.  Pathfinders are working to identify common very flexible terminal/modem on ramps to access order of magnitude HTS capacity and affordability improvement.

GovSat Report:  In addition to HTS, there are other, lower cost satellite services and offerings available to the military that could help decrease costs and increase efficiency. I’m thinking – specifically – about hosted payloads and inclined satellites. Where does the Air Force stand on hosted payloads? Are there plans to increase hosted payload usage in the near future and what barriers may be in the way?

Captain Annicelli: This is another area that is being given careful consideration.  The use of hosted payloads is not new to the Air Force and DoD; however, its use has so far been limited to military payloads on military owned and controlled satellites.  Integrating military payloads on commercial platforms presents challenges. For example, synchronization with a host satellite requires the government to make some compromises regarding satellite location and project schedule.  Moreover, legislation prohibits the launching of military payloads using non-U.S launch providers, which limits the availability of suitable hosts.

Lastly, obtaining approval to transmit military frequencies on a commercial payload is a timely process that could impede synchronization of both military and commercial programs. The DoD is pursuing pathfinders to overcome these constraints. Leveraging hosted payloads is viewed by the Department as a promising means to incorporate mission assurance into our architectures.

GovSat Report: What about inclined satellites for use in UAV and other similar missions? These satellites represent a cost-savings opportunity for the USG and are currently being used/leveraged by ACC. Are there plans to utilize them more in the future?

Captain Annicelli:  The MQ-1/9 community is currently using inclined orbit satellites for CONUS test and training and some OCONUS contingency operations.  Initial testing of inclined orbit operations completed in July 2014 and ACC began transferring some real-world operations at that time.  Additional purchases of inclined orbit bandwidth were completed in FY15 and a larger transition will complete by mid-February 2016.

GovSat Report: The commercial industry believes COMSATCOM adds significant resilience to the military’s communication requirements.  With approximately 200 COMSATCOM satellites around the globe, hundreds of teleports, diversified and encrypted command and control elements and compatibility with the Protected Tactical Waveforms (PTW) of the future, what can industry do to further improve our resiliency?

Captain Annicelli: The DoD has identified six factors that enhance resiliency of space systems (Distribution, Diversity, Protection, Proliferation, Disaggregation, and Deception).  In general, any initiatives that contribute to these factors could potentially promote system resiliency.  COMSATCOM already implements some of these factors to varying degrees and the wideband SATCOM AOA intends to leverage, to the maximum extent feasible, COMSATCOM offerings to deliver assured satellite communications to the warfighter.

GovSat Report: During his SATCON address, General Raymond addressed some steps that he’s taken – including the launch of the Commercial Integration Cell (CIC) within the Joint Space Operations Center – to improve the relationship and collaboration between industry and the Air Force. What has the impact of the CIC been on the partnership between industry and military, and what else can be done to move this partnership forward?

Captain Annicelli: To date the CIC has been extremely valuable both as a portal in determining the scope of anomaly reporting and in improving the SSA common operating picture.

CIC collaboration contributes to improved cooperation and operational effectiveness between government and industry in several key areas of space operations including; improved situational awareness for making better decisions, enhanced ability to detect and mitigate anomalies, the identification and tracking of objects in space and options for technical solutions on automation, common standards and protocols.

What else can be done to move this partnership forward?

The CIC is still in a pilot, research and development period. During this time collaboration between the government and industry will continue and expand.  In addition to the CIC there are multiple partnering opportunities between the government and industry that enhance our ability to operate in space and contribute to the responsible use of space.

GovSat Report: What benefits do you anticipate from the closer integration and partnership between the military and COMSATCOM providers?

Captain Annicelli: Leading up to the wideband AOA, we have engaged substantially with our industry partners, who have offered  a continuous flow of new technology developments to leverage commercial innovation to meet our military requirements.  Efforts to work through cultural, technological, acquisition, and CONOPs limiting factors, such as those within our pathfinder programs, will improve prospects for the DoD to leverage promising technology offerings.

To learn more about inclined satellites, hosted payloads and High Throughput Satellites (HTS), click on the following resources:

• High Throughput Satellites for U.S. Government Applications 

• How Inclined Capacity Reduces Costs For The U.S. Government 

• The Big Beam Boom (High Throughput Satellites) 

• What is a Hosted Payload?

The post USAF on the Role of COMSATCOM in Operations, and the Path Toward Embracing Innovative SATCOM Services appeared first on SES Space and Defense.